Pattern Recognition in Code Submissions: Detecting Plagiarism

Introduction

Code plagiarism detection is a critical challenge for coding platforms, academic institutions, and competitive programming contests. With millions of submissions daily, manual review is impossible, making automated pattern recognition essential for maintaining fairness and academic integrity.

This guide explores the sophisticated algorithms and techniques used to detect code plagiarism, from simple text matching to advanced machine learning approaches that can identify semantic similarities even when code is heavily obfuscated.

The Plagiarism Detection Pipeline

Modern plagiarism detection systems use a multi-stage approach to identify suspicious submissions with high accuracy and minimal false positives.

Plagiarism Detection Flow

┌─────────────┐    ┌─────────────┐    ┌─────────────┐    ┌─────────────┐
│   Code      │───▶│ Normalize & │───▶│  Extract    │───▶│  Similarity │
│ Submission  │    │ Preprocess  │    │  Features   │    │  Analysis   │
└─────────────┘    └─────────────┘    └─────────────┘    └─────────────┘
                           │                   │                   │
                           ▼                   ▼                   ▼
                   ┌─────────────┐    ┌─────────────┐    ┌─────────────┐
                   │ Remove      │    │ AST Trees   │    │ ML Models   │
                   │ Comments    │    │ Hash Values │    │ Thresholds  │
                   └─────────────┘    └─────────────┘    └─────────────┘

Code Normalization Techniques

The first step involves normalizing code to remove superficial differences that don't affect functionality:

class CodeNormalizer {
    static normalize(code) {
        return code
            .replace(/\/\*[\s\S]*?\*\/|\/\/.*$/gm, '') // Remove comments
            .replace(/\s+/g, ' ') // Normalize whitespace
            .replace(/[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*/g, (match) => {
                // Replace variable names with generic tokens
                if (this.isKeyword(match)) return match;
                return this.getVariableToken(match);
            })
            .toLowerCase()
            .trim();
    }
    
    static getVariableToken(varName) {
        if (!this.varMap) this.varMap = new Map();
        if (!this.varMap.has(varName)) {
            this.varMap.set(varName, `var${this.varMap.size + 1}`);
        }
        return this.varMap.get(varName);
    }
}

Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) Analysis

AST-based detection identifies structural similarities that survive variable renaming and code reordering:

class ASTSimilarity {
    static calculateSimilarity(ast1, ast2) {
        const hash1 = this.generateStructuralHash(ast1);
        const hash2 = this.generateStructuralHash(ast2);
        
        return this.jaccardSimilarity(hash1, hash2);
    }
    
    static generateStructuralHash(ast) {
        const features = new Set();
        
        this.traverseAST(ast, (node) => {
            // Extract structural patterns
            features.add(`node_${node.type}`);
            features.add(`depth_${node.depth}`);
            
            if (node.children) {
                const childPattern = node.children
                    .map(child => child.type)
                    .join('_');
                features.add(`pattern_${childPattern}`);
            }
        });
        
        return features;
    }
    
    static jaccardSimilarity(set1, set2) {
        const intersection = new Set([...set1].filter(x => set2.has(x)));
        const union = new Set([...set1, ...set2]);
        return intersection.size / union.size;
    }
}

Advanced Detection Algorithms

Modern systems combine multiple detection methods for comprehensive coverage:

Token-Based Fingerprinting

Generate unique fingerprints based on token sequences:

class TokenFingerprint {
    static generateFingerprint(tokens, windowSize = 5) {
        const fingerprints = new Set();
        
        for (let i = 0; i <= tokens.length - windowSize; i++) {
            const window = tokens.slice(i, i + windowSize);
            const hash = this.hashTokens(window);
            fingerprints.add(hash);
        }
        
        return fingerprints;
    }
    
    static detectSimilarity(fp1, fp2, threshold = 0.8) {
        const common = new Set([...fp1].filter(x => fp2.has(x)));
        const similarity = common.size / Math.min(fp1.size, fp2.size);
        
        return {
            similarity,
            isPlagiarism: similarity > threshold,
            commonPatterns: common.size
        };
    }
}

Machine Learning Approach

Train models to recognize plagiarism patterns across different obfuscation techniques:

Feature Type	Description	Weight
Structural Similarity	AST node patterns and control flow	40%
Token Sequences	N-gram analysis of normalized tokens	30%
Algorithmic Patterns	Loop structures and function calls	20%
Stylometric Features	Coding style and formatting patterns	10%

Handling Obfuscation Techniques

Sophisticated plagiarizers use various obfuscation methods that detection systems must counter:

Common Obfuscation Methods

Variable Renaming: Changing variable and function names
Code Reordering: Rearranging independent statements
Control Flow Changes: Converting loops to recursion or vice versa
Dead Code Insertion: Adding non-functional code segments
Language Translation: Converting between programming languages

Counter-Detection Strategies

class ObfuscationDetector {
    static analyzeSubmission(code, referenceSet) {
        const features = {
            structuralHash: this.getStructuralHash(code),
            algorithmicPattern: this.extractAlgorithm(code),
            complexityProfile: this.analyzeComplexity(code)
        };
        
        const suspiciousMatches = referenceSet.filter(ref => {
            const similarity = this.calculateMultiFeatureSimilarity(
                features, 
                ref.features
            );
            return similarity > 0.85;
        });
        
        return {
            riskScore: this.calculateRiskScore(suspiciousMatches),
            matches: suspiciousMatches,
            confidence: this.calculateConfidence(features)
        };
    }
}

Real-Time Detection Implementation

Efficient algorithms enable real-time plagiarism detection during submission processing:

class RealTimePlagiarismDetector {
    constructor() {
        this.submissionIndex = new Map(); // Fast lookup index
        this.mlModel = new PlagiarismClassifier();
    }
    
    async checkSubmission(newSubmission) {
        const startTime = Date.now();
        
        // Quick hash-based screening
        const quickHash = this.generateQuickHash(newSubmission.code);
        const candidates = this.submissionIndex.get(quickHash) || [];
        
        if (candidates.length === 0) {
            this.indexSubmission(newSubmission, quickHash);
            return { isPlagiarism: false, processingTime: Date.now() - startTime };
        }
        
        // Detailed analysis for candidates
        const detailedResults = await Promise.all(
            candidates.map(candidate => 
                this.performDetailedAnalysis(newSubmission, candidate)
            )
        );
        
        const maxSimilarity = Math.max(...detailedResults.map(r => r.similarity));
        
        return {
            isPlagiarism: maxSimilarity > 0.8,
            similarity: maxSimilarity,
            matches: detailedResults.filter(r => r.similarity > 0.6),
            processingTime: Date.now() - startTime
        };
    }
}

Performance and Accuracy Metrics

Effective plagiarism detection systems balance accuracy with performance:

Precision: 95%+ (minimize false positives)
Recall: 90%+ (catch actual plagiarism cases)
Processing Time: <500ms per submission
Scalability: Handle 10,000+ submissions/hour

Ethical Considerations

Plagiarism detection must balance security with privacy and fairness:

Data Privacy: Secure storage of code submissions
False Positive Handling: Manual review processes for edge cases
Transparency: Clear policies on detection methods
Appeal Process: Mechanisms for disputing detection results

Conclusion

Pattern recognition in code submissions requires sophisticated algorithms that can identify semantic similarities while minimizing false positives. The most effective systems combine multiple detection techniques, from AST analysis to machine learning models, creating robust defenses against various obfuscation methods.

Success in plagiarism detection comes from understanding that code similarity exists on a spectrum, requiring nuanced analysis rather than binary decisions. By implementing multi-layered detection systems with proper ethical safeguards, coding platforms can maintain integrity while fostering genuine learning and competition.

Practice Algorithm Implementation

Ready to implement pattern recognition algorithms? Try our algorithm challenges and build the foundation for creating intelligent detection systems.

Explore Algorithms